#5012: Solaris 10/x86: Numerical noise in sage/rings/qqbar.py
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  mabshoff  |       Owner:  mabshoff
     Type:  defect    |      Status:  new     
 Priority:  major     |   Milestone:  sage-3.3
Component:  solaris   |    Keywords:          
----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------
 Here we go:
 {{{
 [4:36pm] mabs: cwitty: I have another interesting bug for you:
 [4:36pm] mabs: File "/home/mabshoff/build-3.2.3.final/sage-3.2.3.final-
 fulvia/devel/sage/sage/rings/qqbar.py", line 3826:
 [4:36pm] mabs:     sage: cp.complex_roots(30, 1)
 [4:36pm] mabs: Expected:
 [4:36pm] mabs:     [1.189207115002721?,
 [4:36pm] mabs:     -1.189207115002721?,
 [4:36pm] mabs:     1.189207115002721?*I,
 [4:36pm] mabs:     -1.189207115002721?*I]
 [4:36pm] mabs: Got:
 [4:36pm] mabs:     [1.189207115002721?, -1.189207115002722?,
 1.189207115002721?*I, -1.189207115002721?*I]
 [4:37pm] mabs: Notice that the second and third entries are different?
 [4:37pm] mabs: Ehh, the second only
 [4:38pm] cwitty: Yes.  It's probably not a bug; complex_roots doesn't
 guarantee to find the tightest possible
 interval, and it depends on ATLAS which doesn't guarantee identical
 results.
 [4:38pm] mabs: ok
 [4:38pm] mabs: Should I use "..." then?
 [4:38pm] cwitty: Yes.
 }}}

 Patch coming up. Credit is shared with cwitty.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5012>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to