#3829: [with patch, needs work] wester.py disagrees with Wester!!!
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  rlm        |        Owner:  gfurnish  
     Type:  defect     |       Status:  new       
 Priority:  major      |    Milestone:  sage-3.4.1
Component:  symbolics  |   Resolution:            
 Keywords:             |  
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by rlm):

  * summary:  [with patch, needs review] wester.py disagrees with Wester!!!
              => [with patch, needs work] wester.py disagrees
              with Wester!!!

Comment:

 Having `(NO)` in the comment is worse, because the identity is true! What
 should be there is a short explanation of why `bool(f == 0)` returns
 False, even though we know it is true.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3829#comment:5>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of 
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to