#13546: Bug in is_perfect
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.5
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: is_perfect,graph theory | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Jernej Azarija | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Well, I thought while writing this code that it was better to check all
odd holes and antiholes from small sizes to larger ones, than to test
first ALL HOLES (all sizes) then all antiholes (all sizes).
That's the difference between this code and yours. Probably that's just a
matter of taste after all `O_o`. What do you think ?
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13546#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
