#13112: inconsistency calling functions for weighted graphs
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: dkrenn | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: weight graph | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Comment (by brunellus):
I would go for single argument "weight".
* False would be default with meaning "all the same".
* True would use labels.
* Custom function would be used translate edges to weight.
I think this would be easy to remember. On the other side, it is quite a
radical change that would require long transition period.
What do you think?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13112#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
