#13646: Bug in p.add_constraint (when input is True/False)
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen                       |         Owner:  ncohen      
           Type:  defect                       |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major                        |     Milestone:  sage-5.5    
      Component:  linear programming           |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                               |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                          |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen, Volker Braun  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                               |      Stopgaps:              
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Nathann Cohen, Volker Braun', 'oldvalue': u'Nathann 
Cohen'}):

 * cc: dimpase (added)
  * author:  Nathann Cohen => Nathann Cohen, Volker Braun


Old description:

> That awful thing again. See bug report at :
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-support/VVTWhE0w7i0/discussion
>
> Nathann

New description:

 That awful thing again. See bug report at :
 https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-support/VVTWhE0w7i0/discussion

 The problem is that the linear functions need to integrate with the rest
 of sage to play nice. The patched mip.pyx adds a parent class for linear
 functions and suitable coercion and rich comparison. Now the following
 works as expected:
 {{{
 sage: p = MixedIntegerLinearProgram()
 sage: x = p.new_variable()
 sage: x[1] >= 10
 10 <= x_0
 sage: 10 <= x[1]
 10 <= x_0
 }}}

--

Comment:

 I've folded your changes into my patch.

 There are two things to do. 1) the chained inequalities need a parent as
 well, analogous to linear functions. 2) the base ring of the linear
 functions needs to match the capabilities of the backend. I've hardcoded
 the base ring as RDF for now. But somebody needs to add a method to the
 backends to query their supported base ring so we can plug that into the
 linear functions parent.

 But I think those can be dealt with separately, and I'll leave them as an
 exercise for you :-) The biggest usability wart is patched, at least.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13646#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to