#13667: fix docs in sage/coding/code_bounds.py
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: dimpase | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: code bounds | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by ppurka):
The statement above it says
{{{
Thus, solving the solving a generalization of the game of "20
questions" is equivalent to determining `A_2(n,d)`! Using
Sage, you can determine the best known estimates for this number in
2 ways:
}}}
And then it goes on to talk about `linear_code_bound` and other stuff,
which you have now fixed. The problem is that `A_2(n,d)` gives the
estimate for nonlinear codes and not (just) for linear codes. Something
else needs to be added to the paragraph before these functions are
mentioned. Something which says that the bounds in (1) and (2) do not
always give `A_2(n,d)`.... Will think of a proper sentence later. Too
sleepy now.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13667#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
