#13064: The documentation should search methods in classes
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ppurka            |         Owner:  mvngu       
           Type:  defect            |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major             |     Milestone:  sage-5.6    
      Component:  documentation     |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:  documentation     |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A               |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                    |      Stopgaps:              
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------

Comment (by ppurka):

 Replying to [comment:6 jhpalmieri]:
 > I think that for the usage in the ticket description, the functions
 `search_src` and `search_def` are much more appropriate than searching the
 documentation, which only searches the documentation: the reference
 manual, the tutorial, etc. Maybe `search_src` etc. should be better
 publicized. There should be a good way to put a note about them on the
 [http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/search.html search page for the
 docs], for instance. Would that be a good idea?

 Definitely a good idea. I wasn't aware of this `search_src` function until
 very recently. `search_def` seems new to me :) Why doesn't the
 documentation searching function have these two integrated in them? Maybe
 a link from the documentation search page?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13064#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to