#8162: p-adic ring constructor documentation incorrect
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  dmharvey   |         Owner:  roed        
           Type:  defect     |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  minor      |     Milestone:  sage-5.6    
      Component:  padics     |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:  sd35       |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A        |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  David Roe  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:             |      Stopgaps:              
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------

Comment (by saraedum):

 Replying to [comment:7 roed]:
 > I can't think of a good reason to allow a list, but also no particular
 reason not to allow it, since lists are a common container for objects in
 Python.  :-)
 Sure, this makes sense.

 > As for the check parameter, my interpretation of check=False is that it
 only accepts input of a particular format in order to minimize the time
 spent in handling different input formats.  So I think it's completely
 reasonable for your example to fail when you don't pass in something of
 the form [(p, k)].
 I mostly agree with you. I think that with {{{check=False}}} nothing
 should be done that could be expensive (things like checking whether a
 minimal polynomial is actually irreducible). However, I believe that
 {{{check}}} should not have an influence on the interface.

 I adapted your patch to only make the check trigger whether we check that
 {{{p}}} is actually a prime. All the other checks are just
 {{{isinstance}}} and {{{len}}} checks which come essentially for free.

 I looked at some timings and the two versions don't really seem to differ
 with {{{q=(p,k)}}} and {{{check=False}}}.

 Would this patch be acceptable for you?

 [I haven't run full doctests yet, so let me see if the patchbot at least
 likes it.]

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8162#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to