#13735: Fixing a bug in sage.misc.misc.coeff_repr
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: coefficient repr | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Christian Stump | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by stumpc5):
Replying to [comment:4 novoselt]:
> And what about `alpha - 2 * beta`? It does not look like the patch would
improve this.
This is very right. And I think you're right that the patch should not
only handle one particular case (which I was catching in a completely
different context).
I will look into that...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13735#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
