#13742: No Permutation should be created that its method cannot handle
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by ncohen):
Indeed, it is because those examples fail otherwise. Why do you say "one
such example should suffice" ? You want to remove examples from different
files ? Or do you talk about the examples I added myself in the
constructor itself ?
Anyway, I did something very simple : make the modification needed, then
ran the tests. Those which failed got a ``check_input = False``, and as
some failed because they multiplied partitions I also added a flag there.
Of course, all should be removed. But this patch is about saving new bugs,
not fixing those that have been here for years. Besides, it requires
technical knowledge that I do not have.
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13742#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
