#8327: Implement the universal cyclotomic field, using Zumbroich basis
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: Cyclotomic field, Zumbroich basis | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Christian Stump, Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: #13765 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
Comment (by nbruin):
Replying to [comment:167 stumpc5]:
> This is just a patchbot issue, I hope -- it says that 0 tests failed in
several files.
In those cases, don't just look at the summary at the bottom.
There is a bit more info in the log file (use text search on the file name
to find the relevant locations. The errors that arise are of the form:
{{{
File "/mnt/storage2TB/patchbot/Sage/sage-5.5.rc0/local/lib/python/site-
packages/sage/rings/all.py", line 169, in <module>
lazy_import("sage.rings.universal_cyclotomic_field.all","*")
File "lazy_import.pyx", line 850, in sage.misc.lazy_import.lazy_import
(sage/misc/lazy_import.c:5168)
File "lazy_import.pyx", line 900, in
sage.misc.lazy_import.get_star_imports (sage/misc/lazy_import.c:5924)
EOFError
}}}
so apparently the lazy import fails for some reason. If it's a real issue,
perhaps it's due to the order in which the lazy imports get triggered?
Otherwise it might just be a temporary issue with that particular
patchbot.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8327#comment:169>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
