#11635: Ensure that libraries link to the shared version of NTL by default
----------------------------------------------------------+-----------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status:
needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone:
sage-5.6
Component: cygwin | Resolution:
Keywords: cygwin ntl libtool spkg | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jean-Pierre Flori | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------+-----------------
Changes (by kcrisman):
* reviewer: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
Okay, I can't give a 100% positive review because I know nothing about
libtool, but using the upstream solution makes a heck of a lot more sense
if we don't have to add any other dependencies and just a few files, and
the pieces I ''do'' understand of it make sense.
I built 5.5.rc0 with this on sage.math from scratch, and used
`SAGE_UPGRADING=yes` on my Mac with this spkg in 5.4.rc2, and no doctest
failures except on `sage/tests/startup.py` on sage.math, where it
consistently seems to take 2.1 seconds, not less than 2 - but this was
also true of a 5.4.rc1 build which didn't have this spkg, so it seems like
there is just a heavy load there or something. Coupled with its success
on Cygwin, I am strongly inclined to give this positive review, modulo
understanding libtool stuff.
Jeroen, do you get what JP is trying to do and can you give this positive
review based on that part of the changes in the spkg?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11635#comment:62>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
