#13849: deprecate degrevlex when using PolyBoRi
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  malb                 |         Owner:  malb    
           Type:  enhancement          |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major                |     Milestone:  sage-5.6
      Component:  commutative algebra  |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:                       |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:                       |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:          
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by AlexanderDreyer):

 Replying to [comment:6 malb]:
 > Alright, I'll deprecate the use of degrevlex in !PolyBoRi then.
 >
 > But I have to admit that I don't understand:
 >
 > > We have now !DegNegLex (=dp_asc) in Sage, so one could use that
 instead (and of course
 > > reverse variables manually).
 Before I added `DegNegLex`, it had not been possible to emulate
 `DegRevLex` by taking another ordering and revert the variable vector
 ''manually''. This was just because that corresponding other ordering had
 not been there (for the user), yet. (So the automated reversion was done
 for allowing the user to access `dp_asc` somehow, but it was error-prone,
 etc...)

 Today, a Sage-user can just use `DegNegLex` like a ipbori-user uses
 `dp_asc`, so indeed the hacked `DegRevLex` is not needed any more.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13849#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to