#4102: make bessel_J symbolic
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: jwmerrill | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Benjamin Jones | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> > * Maybe Python 3 string formatting? Though I am not sure how to mix
that with LaTeX braces.
>
> ???
Such as [http://docs.python.org/3.1/library/stdtypes.html#str.format this]
and [http://docs.python.org/3.1/library/string.html#formatstrings this].
Just for forward-compatibility (instead of the percent business). Problem
is that when I looked for ways to get around braces "naturally" occurring
in LaTeX, there weren't necessarily a lot of them. (Ways, that is.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4102#comment:17>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
