#13167: Clarify some comments concerning the matplotlib Delaunay code in
list_plot3d.py
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: documentation | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Merged in: sage-5.2.beta0
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> > Apparently [https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/936 this has
been fixed upstream]. ppurka, what do you think - would that take care of
it, or are there other potential issues?
>
> I can't remember the context for this trac ticket. Are you suggesting
that we remove the code in Sage which checks for duplicate points?
I was saying that maybe we don't need to add noise any more. But upon
further review, the commit in question was about duplicate points, not
points in the same subspace, so we probably still need the randomization
for now. I don't know if we have code checking for duplicates.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13167#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
