#13364: Upgrade Maxima to 5.29.1
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------
Reporter: kcrisman |
Owner: tbd
Type: enhancement |
Status: positive_review
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: packages |
Resolution:
Keywords: maxima spkg | Work
issues:
Report Upstream: Reported upstream. Developers acknowledge bug. |
Reviewers: Karl-Dieter Crisman, François Bissey, Leif Leonhardy, Paul
Zimmermann
Authors: Jean-Pierre Flori, Dmitrii Pasechnik | Merged
in:
Dependencies: |
Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------------------+---------
Comment (by fbissey):
Replying to [comment:109 kcrisman]:
> Replying to [comment:107 fbissey]:
> > Well it works but I am not sure we should patch exp_integral.py this
way. The old result was to demonstrate that something was broken. We
should change the comment to reflect that is fixed or find another broken
example. By comment I mean this bit:
> > {{{
> > Note that due to some problems with the way Maxima handles these
> > expressions, definite integrals can sometimes give unexpected
> > results (typically when using inexact endpoints) due to
> > inconsistent branching::
> > }}}
> > That may be a bit pedantic however.
> No, that's a good point actually. Thanks for volunteering to ask the
Maxima list for such an example :-)
You are welcome, I guess :P
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13364#comment:113>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.