#13324: Upgrade ECL to 12.12.1 and let it build on (recent) Cygwins
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Reporter: jpflori |
Owner: tbd
Type: defect |
Status: needs_work
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: cygwin |
Resolution:
Keywords: cygwin ecl spkg | Work
issues:
Report Upstream: Fixed upstream, but not in a stable release. |
Reviewers: François Bissey, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Dmitrii Pasechnik
Authors: Jean-Pierre Flori | Merged
in:
Dependencies: #13860 |
Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Comment (by jpflori):
Replying to [comment:153 jdemeyer]:
> The timeouts happen during various tests, seemingly at random. These
are the results of 1000 verbose unbuffered non-long tests, 4 timeouts:
> {{{
> Trying:
> lisp(Integer(2)).bool()###line 418:_sage_ >>> lisp(2).bool()
> Expecting:
> True
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! PROCESS KILLED! *** ***
> }}}
>
Too ad, that's exactly the kind of issues I had and thought to be solved
by building ECL single threaded (which I intended to do anyway, it is just
I forgot to configure it so in the first place, i don't think the way we
handle signals woud be compatible with a multi-threaded ECL, Nils surely
have an opinion on that, there are also potentiel problems with Maxima as
written in SPKG.txt, but I have not looked at this).
So the new ECL interacts badly with pexpect?
> Trying:
> one == one###line 390:_sage_ >>> one == one
> Expecting:
> True
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! PROCESS KILLED! *** ***
> }}}
>
> {{{
> Trying:
> lisp.eval('(+ 2 2)')###line 107:_sage_ >>> lisp.eval('(+ 2 2)')
> Expecting:
> '4'
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! PROCESS KILLED! *** ***
> }}}
>
> {{{
> Trying:
> a = lisp(Integer(3)); b = lisp(Integer(5))###line 7:_sage_ >>> a
= lisp(3); b = lisp(5)
> Expecting nothing
> *** *** Error: TIMED OUT! PROCESS KILLED! *** ***
> }}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13324#comment:156>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.