#13889: Better automatic backtrace
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  vbraun          |         Owner:  jdemeyer  
           Type:  enhancement     |        Status:  needs_work
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.6  
      Component:  build           |    Resolution:            
       Keywords:                  |   Work issues:            
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:            
        Authors:  Volker Braun    |     Merged in:            
   Dependencies:  #13881, #13866  |      Stopgaps:            
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by vbraun):

 Replying to [comment:29 jdemeyer]:
 > Which make me wonder: should we change the Python spkg to make symbolic
 links like to one above (say, based on which libraries exist in
 `/usr/lib`).

 No, definitely not. Library versioning is there for a reason. In the case
 of GDB you might get away with it since GDB just runs an embedded Python,
 but anything that really touches Python internals might get very upset.

 But maybe we can LD_PRELOAD libpython just for gdb, does that work?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13889#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to