#9107: Nested class name mangling can be wrong in case of double nesting
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: hivert | Owner: nthiery
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Volker Braun
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: #12808 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Comment (by SimonKing):
Replying to [comment:14 jhpalmieri]:
> The same issue arose in #13851 (see
[http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13851#comment:10 comment 10]).
I'm not sure why those dots are there, and I personally think they should
be removed, but someone intentionally put them there.
I think the dot is simply wrong - or is it ignored by Sphynx?
Actually here it is even worse. The text is documentation of a functorial
construction, but refers to a parent method - that can't possibly work
without an explicit reference to the method which must include the class
which the method belongs to.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9107#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
