#13657: Mention RDF, CDF in linear algebra tutorial
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-
Reporter: ppurka |
Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement |
Status: needs_review
Priority: minor |
Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: documentation |
Resolution:
Keywords: |
Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers: Dmitrii Pasechnik
Authors: Punarbasu Purkayastha, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Volker Braun |
Merged in:
Dependencies: |
Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------+-
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Punarbasu Purkayastha, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Volker
Braun', 'oldvalue': u'Punarbasu Purkayastha, Dmitrii Pasechnik'}):
* cc: vbraun (added)
* author: Punarbasu Purkayastha, Dmitrii Pasechnik => Punarbasu
Purkayastha, Dmitrii Pasechnik, Volker Braun
Old description:
> The default rings `RR` and `CC` do not support eigenvalue and eigenvector
> computations for all the cases. It varies from matrix to matrix, and
> hence these fields shouldn't be encouraged for eigenvalue/eigenvector
> computations. I am adding a patch to the tutorial which mentions `RDF`
> and `CDF` as the go-to field for such computations.
> ----
> Apply to `devel/sage`
> 1. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.patch]
> 2. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.de.patch]
> 3. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.ru.patch]
> Then build the tutorial using
> {{{
> sage -docbuild tutorial html
> }}}
New description:
The default rings `RR` and `CC` do not support eigenvalue and eigenvector
computations for all the cases. It varies from matrix to matrix, and hence
these fields shouldn't be encouraged for eigenvalue/eigenvector
computations. I am adding a patch to the tutorial which mentions `RDF` and
`CDF` as the go-to field for such computations.
----
Apply to `devel/sage`
1. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.patch]
2. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.de.patch]
3. [attachment:trac_13657-linal_RDF.ru.patch]
Then build the tutorial using
{{{
sage -docbuild en/tutorial html
sage -docbuild de/tutorial html
sage -docbuild ru/tutorial html
}}}
--
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13657#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
