#13546: Bug in is_perfect
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: is_perfect,graph theory | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Jernej Azarija,
Sébastien Labbé
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: #8952 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Nathann Cohen', 'oldvalue': u'Jernej Azarija'}):
* reviewer: Sébastien Labbé => Jernej Azarija, Sébastien Labbé
* author: Jernej Azarija => Nathann Cohen
Comment:
All test passed on {{{sage/graphs/generic_graph.py}}}. Documentation
builds fine. Doctests which were broken before were added in the latest
patch. To me it is a positive review. I let Jernej Azarija say a
last word on it.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13546#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
