#14019: equality is broken for Posets
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:13 ncohen]:
> > Obviously. We all agree that this is the rationale for the new default
> > value.
>
> Just to make sure everybody accepts that code will be broken.
Please reread. The new default is what we both agree on and is correct.
> Nice. Now, if I have a class that I define myself which contains
elements which belong to the category framework : does it mean that this
class has to be `UniqueRepresentation` ?
No. Some parents don't have unique representation.
> Fix the bugs you introduce and we have a deal.
I did not introduce this bug. And anyway it's Chet's fault.
> How do I break out of this infinite loop ?
I know it's frustrating when one can't have an influence to improve the
world. But in the case at hand the only step you can take is to stop
wasting our time repeating the same things over and over.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14019#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
