#6743: cygwin metaticket: port Sage to Microsoft Windows (via Cygwin): stage 1 
--
make building Sage automatic
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  was          |         Owner:  was         
           Type:  enhancement  |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major        |     Milestone:  sage-5.7    
      Component:  cygwin       |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:  sd31 sd32    |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A          |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:               |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:               |      Stopgaps:              
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by jpflori):

 * cc: kcrisman (added)
  * status:  new => needs_review


Comment:

 New ptest log for 5.7.beta1 at
 http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpflori/ptest-5.7.beta1-cygwin.log

 The failing tests are:
 {{{
 The following tests failed:

         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sagenb-main/sagenb/misc/misc.py #
 Exception from doctest framework
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/functions/other.py # 1
 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/geometry/lattice_polytope.py #
 96 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/graphs/genus.pyx # 2 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/gsl/ode.pyx # 3 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/libs/lcalc/lcalc_Lfunction.pyx
 # 69 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/libs/pari/gen.pyx # 4 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/cython.py # 3 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/getusage.py # 4 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/inline_fortran.py # 3
 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py # 1
 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/graphics.py # Time out
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py # Time out
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/implicit_plot3d.py
 # Time out
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/plot3d.py # Time
 out
         sage -t  -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__ternary_Tornaria.py # 13
 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py # 1 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/rings/tests.py # 4 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_field.py # Time out
         sage -t  -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/heegner.py # Time out
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/schemes/toric/fano_variety.py
 # 12 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/symbolic/expression.pyx # 1
 doctests failed
         sage -t  -force_lib devel/sage/sage/tests/cmdline.py # Time out
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 }}}

 Some were expected:
 * sage/libs/lcalc/lcalc_Lfunction.pyx with fix at #13351
 * sage/geometry/lattice_polytope.py with fix at #13960
 * sage/schemes/toric/fano_variety.py is #13960 as well
 * sage/misc/getusage.py which is #9170
 * sage/graphs/genus.pyx which is in fact #9170
 * sage/libs/pari/gen.pyx which is also #9170
 * sage/rings/tests.py as well #9170
 * sage/quadratic_forms/quadratic_form__ternary_Tornaria.py which is
 hopefully the same pari stack problem as #9176
 Some are trivial:
 * sage/geometry/lattice_polytope.py which is numerical noise
 * sage/rings/arith.py as well
 * sage/symbolic/expression.pyx as well
 Some look more serious:
 * sage/misc/cython.py but that might just be a dynamic library extension
 problem
 * sage/misc/inline_fortran.py which does not find gfortran?!
 * sage/misc/sageinspect.py -> fork errors... maybe a rebase could fix that
 * sage/gsl/ode.pyx

 And the other are timeouts (for now).


 But the aim of this ticket is to build Sage, so I guess we can say we are
 quite finished with that :)
 And #13841 which aims at starting Sage is as well :)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743#comment:116>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to