#13975: improve error reporting in some tests
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: cnassau | Owner: nthiery
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: categories | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Christian Nassau | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by cnassau):
Replying to [comment:5 nthiery]:
> However, with the current patch, this does reduce the lisibility of the
test function: I want the mathematical test to be written in a way that is
as close as possible to the math.
I suggested this patch because it would have saved me a lot of time
recently. Now you're saying we can't have more helpful error messages
because
{{{tester.assert_(self.prod([x]) == x)}}}
is so much more readable than
{{{tester.assertEqual(self.prod([x]),x,LazyFormat("self.prod([x]) != x
for x=%s") % (x,))}}}
Frankly, I find this un peu ridicule...
Cheers, \\
Christian
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13975#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
