#6637: standardize the interface to TransitiveIdeal and friends
-----------------------------------------------------------------+----------
Reporter: nthiery |
Owner: mhansen
Type: enhancement |
Status: new
Priority: major |
Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: combinatorics |
Resolution:
Keywords: backtrack, enumerated set, transitive closure | Work
issues:
Report Upstream: N/A |
Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged
in:
Dependencies: |
Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------------------------+----------
Comment (by slabbe):
> I don't know yet what would be the best name for the argument provided
by the user to describe the relation.
For the above 4 cases, I would suggest arguments like the following :
{{{
RecursiveSet(roots, relation)
RecursiveSet(roots, relation, forest=True)
RecursiveSet(roots, relation, graded=True)
RecursiveSet(roots, relation, symmetric=True)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6637#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
