#10779: Improve coverage test for structure/element.pyx
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Reporter: ejeanvoi | Owner: mvngu
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: doctest | Resolution:
Keywords: beginner | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
Changes (by knsam):
* keywords: => beginner
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Old description:
> Improve coverage test for structure/element.pyx
New description:
Improve coverage test for structure/element.pyx
Status as of Sage 5.7.beta4: 26% done -- 118 functions to doctest.
--
Comment:
Hello!
- Please refer to the
[http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html conventions page]
for how to write in ReST markup. For instance, you need a blank line after
`::` for getting verbatim environment. Also, please note that, a verbatim
environment is preceded by `::`.
- It'd be nice if you also go ahead and add more doctests. Also, please
correct the docstrings formatting whenever you can -- like codifying
`self`, `True` and such by using two backticks...
- Major: "ERROR: Please add a `TestSuite(s).run()` doctest."
Hoping to hear from you soon...
Cheers, Kannappan.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10779#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
