#11490: Add a thematic tutorial on coercion and categories
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing                              |         Owner:  
mvngu                              
           Type:  enhancement                            |        Status:  
needs_review                       
       Priority:  major                                  |     Milestone:  
sage-5.7                           
      Component:  documentation                          |    Resolution:       
                              
       Keywords:  categories coercion thematic tutorial  |   Work issues:       
                              
Report Upstream:  N/A                                    |     Reviewers:  
Vincent Delecroix, Travis Scrimshaw
        Authors:  Simon King                             |     Merged in:       
                              
   Dependencies:  #14084                                 |      Stopgaps:       
                              
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------

Comment (by dimpase):

 Replying to [comment:28 SimonKing]:
 > I suggest to elaborate as follows:
 > {{{
 > The parent
 > ----------
 >
 > This tutorial explains Sage's category and coercion framework by means
 of a
 > detailled example, namely a toy implementation of fraction fields and
 fraction
 > field elements. Since we wish to implement a special kind of fields, it
 makes
 > sense to build on top of the base class :class:`sage.rings.ring.Field`
 > provided by Sage.
 > }}}

 IMHO the 1st sentence,
 {{{
 This tutorial explains Sage's category and coercion framework by means of
 a
 detailed example, namely a toy implementation of fraction fields and
 fraction
 field elements.
 }}}
 belongs to the part above Outline. (and it's '''detailed''' with one 'l').

 And then in "The parent" part you can say
 {{{
 Since we wish to implement a special kind of fields, namely, the fraction
 fields, it makes
 sense to build on top of the base class :class:`sage.rings.ring.Field`
 provided by Sage.
 }}}
 (notice '''namely, the fraction fields''' that I added.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11490#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to