#8392: Check when defining a permutation by one-line notation (list of int)
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
       Reporter:  nborie                              |         Owner:  tscrim  
    
           Type:  defect                              |        Status:  
needs_review
       Priority:  major                               |     Milestone:  
sage-5.7    
      Component:  combinatorics                       |    Resolution:          
    
       Keywords:  permutation, check, days38, days45  |   Work issues:          
    
Report Upstream:  N/A                                 |     Reviewers:          
    
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw                    |     Merged in:          
    
   Dependencies:                                      |      Stopgaps:          
    
------------------------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by tscrim):

  * keywords:  permutation, check, days38 => permutation, check, days38,
               days45
  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Old description:

> Since the user is currently very strongly encouraged to use good
> formatting in #13742, there is no longer a good way to do certain methods
> which were more designed for words (ex. `robinson_schensted()`)
>
> Before, sage would accept that:
> {{{
> sage: Permutation([1,1,1,1,1])
> [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
> sage: Permutation([-12,1,3])
> [-12, 1, 3]
> }}}
>
> This ticket plans to separate out the `RSK` into a global function which
> takes various types of input and runs the row insertion and also does the
> same for the inverse. This ticket might also have permutations inherit
> from `Word`.

New description:

 Since the user is currently very strongly encouraged to use good
 formatting in #13742, there is no longer a good way to do certain methods
 which were more designed for words (ex. `robinson_schensted()`)

 Before, sage would accept that:
 {{{
 sage: Permutation([1,1,1,1,1])
 [1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
 sage: Permutation([-12,1,3])
 [-12, 1, 3]
 }}}
 This ticket is to give an easy way to run RSK on the first one.

 More explicitly, this ticket separates out the `RSK` into a global
 function which takes various types of input and runs the row insertion and
 also does the same for the inverse.

 ----

 Apply only: [attachment: trac_8392-check_permutation-ts.patch]

--

Comment:

 For patchbot:

 Apply: trac_8392-check_permutation-ts.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8392#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to