#9235: Doctest coverage for sage.categories.homset
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
       Reporter:  SimonKing                |         Owner:  nthiery      
           Type:  defect                   |        Status:  needs_review 
       Priority:  minor                    |     Milestone:  sage-5.7     
      Component:  categories               |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  doctest coverage homset  |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                      |     Reviewers:  Niles Johnson
        Authors:  Simon King               |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:                           |      Stopgaps:               
-------------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):

  * status:  needs_work => needs_review


Old description:

> The doctest coverage for sage.categories.homset was
> {{{
> SCORE devel/sage-main/sage/categories/homset.py: 52% (13 of 25)
> }}}
>
> My patch covers all but two methods:
>
>  * get_action_c
>  * coerce_map_from_c
>
> These two return (by default) None. Is there a good ''indirect'' doctest
> for these two? I am not familiar with {{{get_action}}}, and I don't know
> what {{{coerce_map_from_c}}} does, compared with {{{_coerce_map_from_}}}.
> Perhaps the reviewer can explain it to me, so that I or s/he can add the
> two missing tests?
>
> == Apply ==
>
> 1. [attachment: 9235_doctest_homset.patch]

New description:

 The doctest coverage for sage.categories.homset was
 {{{
 SCORE devel/sage-main/sage/categories/homset.py: 52% (13 of 25)
 }}}

 My patch covers all but two methods:

  * get_action_c
  * coerce_map_from_c

 These two return (by default) None. Is there a good ''indirect'' doctest
 for these two? I am not familiar with {{{get_action}}}, and I don't know
 what {{{coerce_map_from_c}}} does, compared with {{{_coerce_map_from_}}}.
 Perhaps the reviewer can explain it to me, so that I or s/he can add the
 two missing tests?

 == Apply ==

 1. [attachment: 9235_doctest_homset.patch]

 Since the reviewer patch changes code, I think it should be moved to a
 separate ticket.

--

Comment:

 The patch is updated. I think that introducing a deprecation warning for
 the two survivors of the old coercion model should be the subject of a new
 ticket. This here should be "doctests only".

 Therefore:

 Apply 9235_doctest_homset.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9235#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to