#11410: 01 sequence or east-north sequence for partitions
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  pdehaye              |         Owner:  sage-combinat          
         
           Type:  enhancement          |        Status:  needs_review           
         
       Priority:  minor                |     Milestone:  sage-5.7               
         
      Component:  combinatorics        |    Resolution:                         
         
       Keywords:  partition            |   Work issues:                         
         
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:  Frédéric Chapoton, 
Nathann Cohen
        Authors:  Paul-Olivier Dehaye  |     Merged in:                         
         
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:                         
         
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by tscrim):

 Replying to [comment:11 darij]:
 > Curiosity question: What is a difference between a normal and an
 "indirect" doctest?

 It's for functions/methods that aren't explicitly called in the doctest.
 For example `Foo._repr_()` being called when you execute `sage: Foo`.

 As for the patch, the {{{INPUT:}}} block in indented one too many times.
 Could you put some of the alternative names in the function's
 documentation? Also I feel like the formatting would be better in latex
 formatting {{{`1-0`}}}.

 A math/documentation note, these also arise from affine permutations and
 have connections to `k`-Schur functions (see '''k-Schur Functions and
 Affine Schubert Calculus''', pages 24-25, http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3569
 and from this you could also justify calling these '''plus-minus
 sequences''').

 Finally could you rebase this on the (soon to be completed) #13605? I'll
 do the final review if you rebase it as soon as #13605 is done. Promise.

 Thank you,[[BR]]
 Travis

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11410#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to