#11457: Witt Vectors
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: tdupu | Owner: roed
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.7
Component: padics | Resolution:
Keywords: witt vectors, padic, rings | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Taylor Dupuy, David Roe | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
On an unrelated note, it would be helpful to know which (all? just the
last two?) patches here are to be applied, and perhaps to make one big
"master" patch as well, if relevant.
@darij: would it be possible to "fix" the issues you raise by appropriate
documentation about allowable base rings (or even try/except or assert for
inappropriate ones)? I do agree that whatever infrastructure is here
should be robust enough to eventually support at least the big Witt
vectors, if not even other sets. Maybe a placeholder class to inherit
from...
Another thought - is there really any reason to have the functions
`wittsum` etc. as separate functions?
Finally, there are various formatting issues, but that's not worth fixing
until a more final patch, likely.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11457#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
