#8703: Combinatorial Rooted Ordered and Binary Trees
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------
       Reporter:  hivert                             |         Owner:  hivert   
   
           Type:  enhancement                        |        Status:  
needs_review
       Priority:  major                              |     Milestone:  sage-5.7 
   
      Component:  combinatorics                      |    Resolution:           
   
       Keywords:  trees, Cernay2012                  |   Work issues:           
   
Report Upstream:  N/A                                |     Reviewers:           
   
        Authors:  Florent Hivert, Frédéric Chapoton  |     Merged in:           
   
   Dependencies:  #8702                              |      Stopgaps:           
   
-----------------------------------------------------+----------------------

Comment (by hivert):

 Hi Darij,

 Replying to [comment:31 darij]:
 > Hi Florent! Thanks for the reply. One reason why I did not propose any
 > concrete changes to the code is that I have no idea what patches are
 > currently dependent on this one (I only knew of Viviane's new one with
 the
 > Dyck paths) and I want to avoid merge conflicts. I hoped some of you had
 a
 > better overview of what's happening with trees these days.

 Here is some basic overview :-)
 {{{
 popcorn-*inat/.hg/patches $ grep -l Trees *.patch
 algebras_over_operads-fc.patch
 finite_semigroup-nt.patch
 operads-fh.patch
 operads_more-fc.patch
 poset-from-tree-fc.patch
 pretty_console_print-EliX-jbp.patch
 q_tree_factorial-fc.patch
 sage-demos-and-tutorials-nt.patch
 shape_tree-fc.patch
 shuffle-operads-fc.patch
 trac_11529-rooted_trees-fh.patch
 trac_13855_planar_binary_trees_hopf_algebra-EliX-jbp.patch
 trac_13987_mary_trees-vp.patch
 trac_14086-parking_functions-dm.patch
 trac_8703-trees-fh.patch
 trees_symmetry_factor-fh.patch
 }}}


 > If you tell me there's no danger of conflicting changes, I can add the
 fixes
 > I'd like to see; otherwise I'd prefer someone else to do it or to wait
 until
 > the current slew of tree patches is merged. I'll try to come up with a
 doc
 > for the initialization later today, though, provided I can wrap my head
 > around it.

 I think if it's just docstring, there will only be trivial rebasing.
 Anyway,
 they must be fixed. Unfortunately, I'm moving from my flat from a new
 house on
 Saturday and Sunday so I won't have a lot of time working on trees... If
 you
 can take care of all the docstring problem you mentioned once for all in a
 review patch, I will really appreciate.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8703#comment:32>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to