#14140: Reorganization of set partitions
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.8
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: set partitions | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: #13605 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by ghseeli):
Travis, I have been working on some code to refine partition_algebra since
Sage Days 38 last summer. I have just posted it to trac so that you can
view it (#14234). There is still some work to be done (doctests are not
perfect, although it did pass when I ran it today.) My code, however,
would be refined greatly by some of your implementations in this patch.
Chris, all the SetPartitions with a letter and k after them are from
partition_algebra. It seems to me that these structures, while represented
by set partitions, are better understood as algebras, as explained in the
ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14140#comment:16>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
