#11863: Bilinear Map
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: annahaensch | Owner: justin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.8
Component: quadratic forms | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Kannappan Sampath
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Comment (by knsam):
Replying to [comment:11 annahaensch]:
Hello Anna,
> Regarding the question about 2, I am following the conventions set forth
in O'meara, for which we require a field of characteristic not 2. This is
different from the conventions used in Scharlau's work, but is equally
standard.
Anna, I sincerely hope you're not offended! I am absolutely fine with both
of these conventions. I am convinced that this should be given positive
review now! If you agree (could chapoton and you please fill in your real
name as author), I shall set this to positive review.
> Yes, we can! I'm not sure if it's implemented. Certainly it would be
an issue separate from this function, since this uses the quadratic form
to define the bilinear. But that is something to consider in the future.
Agreed! I shall open a new ticket.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11863#comment:12>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
