#14254: OverflowErrors in TripleDictEraser
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: jdemeyer | Owner: robertwb
Type: defect | Status: positive_review
Priority: blocker | Milestone: sage-5.8
Component: coercion | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: SimonKing
Authors: Jeroen Demeyer | Merged in:
Dependencies: #13387 | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by SimonKing):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
* reviewer: => SimonKing
Comment:
OK, I believe Jeroen when he says that building the documentation on his
32-bit systems works with the patch, while it reproducibly failed without
the patch.
I think the solution makes sense: id(X) returns a positive number, and
this may very well be beyond what a signed number type of the same size
(such as Py_ssize_t) can take.
The patchbot gives a green blob, too. Hence, I hope it is safe to give
this a positive review (but I think #14159 will be better, on the long
run).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14254#comment:39>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
