#14266: Fix sage_input and pretty print for NonCommutativeSymmetricFunctions,
others.
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: elixyre | Owner: was
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: user interface | Resolution:
Keywords: ascii-art | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Priez | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by VivianePons):
* cc: VivianePons (added)
Comment:
I am a bit new on this discussion, but I want to add my contribution.
I think having `` _pretty_repr_`` as a plus for combinatorial objects is a
good idea and useful. It is not the same as ``_repr_``.
First, you don't want to change the repr of every combinatorial objects to
have pretty prints, this will just break everything every where. (I am
thinking of trees, Dyck paths, partitions...). Most objects already had a
way being pretty printed, it was just not centralized and could not be
used in linear combinations.
I actually think having the two ``_repr_`` and ``_pretty_repr_`` is
useful. I have started to work with Jean-Baptiste's patch and depending on
what I want to do with the output, I use both the pretty prints and usal
prints.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14266#comment:8>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
