#12780: Be more careful about setting the Maxima 'domain'
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: mjo | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.6
Component: symbolics | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Burcin Erocal
Authors: Michael Orlitzky | Merged in: sage-5.6.beta0
Dependencies: #12845 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> Dr. Fateman recently (March 14) mentioned on the Maxima list that
`radcan` was written before Maxima's assumptions framework, and that all
simplification takes place outside of `radcan`.
I think that what happened is that this is not part of the assumption
framework! There is no assuming going on here, as far as Maxima is
concerned. See for instance Fateman's answer
[http://ask.sagemath.org/question/767/simplification-errors-in-simple-
expressions here].
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12780#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
