#5768: improve coverage of generators.pyx
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: mabshoff
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-3.4.2
Component: doctest | Keywords:
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Comment(by was):
This file is just scary. The second function I tried to document is:
{{{
cpdef get_from_index(self, i):
return self._obj._gen_(i)
}}}
I couldn't find any object in all of Sage with a {{{_gen_}}} method -- I
see now way this could ever work. Hence I can't see any way
{{{Generators_naturals}}} would ever work. This whole file just scares
me. I don't get it at all.
I give up.
This file was evidently 100% part of this changeset:
{{{
changeset: 10231:8dea97c4b4f0
parent: 10067:717c10d9cd4a
user: David Roe <[email protected]>
date: Tue Jul 29 01:24:30 2008 -0700
summary: generators object
}}}
I rue the day I ever allowed a single non-doctested function into Sage.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5768#comment:1>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
