#14406: Various prereq fixes
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer        |         Owner:  drkirkby    
           Type:  enhancement     |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.9    
      Component:  porting         |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                  |   Work issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:                  |      Stopgaps:              
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by kcrisman):

 > To repeat Karl-Dieter's question: What is Cephes then needed for at all
 [on e.g. FreeBSD]?
 I don't recall asking about FreeBSD, simply stating that we do need it
 there.  You can ask Stephen M-S about that on one of those ticket.
 > Indeed, we cheat for logl/sqrtl/tgammal/lgammal in
 sage/symbolic/pynac_cc.h just as we do with the R patch for logl.
 However, I do invite someone to open a ticket to re-enable Cephes on
 Cygwin so that we can drop that entire file!  If that is indeed the
 "right" solution.
 ----

 > But please, let's do that later...
 Yes, please.
 > I guess we should check that the lapack (in fact its dependency
 liblapack0) and liblapack-devel packages are installed on Cygwin.
 Oh, right.  Good point, since #10508 is not yet in.  But I was discouraged
 earlier from adding this to prereq, that's why I figured #10508 was
 better.  I would definitely be in support of this being done on this
 ticket, and I've put something about that at #6743.
 > For the moment, just:
 > * check for sqrtl except on FreeBSD and Cygwin,
 > * rant if not available, provide links to C99 standard, suggest the user
 to use a mainstream OS, invite him to have coffee or whatever (and maybe
 mention the fact that if he dares to set SAGE_PORT, then he could also try
 to manually install the cephes spkg when something fails because of the
 lack of "long double" functions).
 I think that some variation on this is very reasonable.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14406#comment:31>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to