#13735: Fixing a bug in sage.misc.misc.coeff_repr
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: stumpc5 | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.9
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: coefficient repr | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Christian Stump | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment (by vittucek):
Hi!
Scratching my own itch, I've changed the code for repr_lincomb to properly
handle negative coefficients as well as zero. It required one change to
how coeff_repr works which may cause problems. I've included testcases for
repr_lincomb.
Is there a way how can I test the rest of sage only for this specific
change? I don't want to run all the numerical test which take quite a
while on my machine.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13735#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
