#3668: Functionality of "Set"
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ljpk              |         Owner:  tscrim       
           Type:  defect            |        Status:  needs_work   
       Priority:  minor             |     Milestone:  sage-5.9     
      Component:  documentation     |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  documentation     |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A               |     Reviewers:  Nathann Cohen
        Authors:  Travis Scrimshaw  |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:  #11366            |      Stopgaps:               
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):

  * status:  positive_review => needs_work


Comment:

 What's the point of tests like
 {{{
 sage: hash(s) == hash(s)
 True
 }}}

 I prefer to keep the actual hash in this case:
 {{{
 sage: hash(s)
 1234   # 32-bit
 56789  # 64-bit
 }}}

 Minor comment: `#indirect doctest` isn't needed for `_underscored_`
 methods.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3668#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to