#12848: Bug in order_ideal_complement_generators: 'down'
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: PLEASE CHANGE | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: posets | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nicolas M. ThiƩry | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by chapoton):
Well, the issue is that of "order_ideal" is a synonym for "lower ideal"
and "order_filter" is a synonym for "upper_ideal". Before this patch,
everywhere one uses "order_ideal" and "order_filter". In my opinion, these
are bad names, and "lower ideal" and "upper ideal" are much better.
And, well, I think that "upper set" and "lower set" are '''very bad'''
too.
In any case, there is still some cleanup to do.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12848#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.