#12848: Bug in order_ideal_complement_generators: 'down'
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery            |         Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  PLEASE CHANGE      |        Status:  new          
       Priority:  major              |     Milestone:  sage-5.10    
      Component:  combinatorics      |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  posets             |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                |     Reviewers:               
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry  |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:                     |      Stopgaps:               
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment (by chapoton):

 Well, the issue is that of "order_ideal" is a synonym for "lower ideal"
 and "order_filter" is a synonym for "upper_ideal". Before this patch,
 everywhere one uses "order_ideal" and "order_filter". In my opinion, these
 are bad names, and "lower ideal" and "upper ideal" are much better.

 And, well, I think that "upper set" and "lower set" are '''very bad'''
 too.

 In any case, there is still some cleanup to do.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12848#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to