#14528: Additional doctests for the graph module
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: azi | Owner: tbd
Type: PLEASE CHANGE | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by azi):
Replying to [comment:4 ncohen]:
> > Yes I was told by Harald this could happen :-) He also told me that
the #long time directive should help with that!
>
> If a test takes more than 5 seconds I guess you should put a # long time
somewhere. Perhaps it is even written somewhere in the developper's
manual.
>
> > My motivation for doing such tests is that then you have a quick
indicator if something went wrong somewhere.. If the tests run 10s and
after a change they go to 20s you don't notice this as you would notice if
it goes from 5mins to 10mins.
>
> Agreed. But then what we need is a way to record past performances, not
make tests longer. I an quite unaware of the time Sage takes to compile
because it is usually so long that I run it before leaving my office. So
compiling Sage "takes one night", whatever is added to it `:-P`
Yes! Also considering the fact that your hardware setup may change
drastically over the years...
BTW do you use the make flag that makes use of parallelization when
building sage?
>
> > I agree that is not practical for day to day testings but isn't #long
time supposed to fix that?
>
> Hmmm... What we need is a way to record performances I guess. That's an
interesting problem though `O_O`
>
> But I really think that you are going too far with these tests `:-/`
Yes! As mentioned in the other trac ticket I agree with you. Though I
still think the current tests are way way to small (testing just a few
documentation examples).
We need a better framework for extensive tests. Something that you can run
over the night, as is I don't feel relieved when the tests pass with
success.
>
> Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14528#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
