#14536: Random tournaments, a misnamed method and a segfault
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: ncohen | Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: graph theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen | Merged in:
Dependencies: #14475 | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Yo,
I just had a look, and it sounds very reasonnable.
Three details:
- Why not displaying anymore the number of vertices in the name method of
TransitiveTournament? Since other graphs do the same that would be
consistent.
- A potential alternative name would be "chain"
- In the tournament generator using Nauty, once the nauty command is
constructed, it seems that all the rest is generic (calling Nauty, parsing
the output, building and yielding the graphs). What about extracting this
into a generic function?
In the long run, it would be nice to have a uniform interface for
generating graphs using either Sage's engine or nauty (say with an
algo=nauty/Sage optional switch, which would default to Sage, unless nauty
become a standard package some day.).
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14536#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
