#14416: weird conversion from QQ to RDF
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: zimmerma | Owner: AlexGhitza
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: basic arithmetic | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Paul
Zimmermann
Authors: Paul Zimmermann, Jeroen Demeyer | Merged in:
Dependencies: #14335, #14336 | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by jdemeyer):
Replying to [comment:52 zimmerma]:
> Jeroen, a few tiny comments:
>
> * in the following test, you can replace 20 by 13.
Sure, but I wanted some safety margin.
> Also, you could add {{{all([RDF(q) == RR(q) for q in Q])}}}
OK, but then for all covergents (before throwing away the first 20).
> * is the {{{except?}}} value really needed in {{{mpq_get_d_nearest}}}?
Yes, because `sig_on()` can throw exceptions.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14416#comment:53>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
