#13110: ComplexNumber should be able to accept the Python complex type
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Reporter: eviatarbach | Owner: jason, jkantor
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: numerical | Resolution:
Keywords: complex, beginner | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
Comment (by vbraun):
`CC._element_constructor_` is probably slow for string input since it
evaluates the input. I'm a bit uncomfortable with that security-wise,
though there are certainly bigger fish to fry.
I agree that it would be best if `ComplexNumber` would just delegate
everything to `CC`. The latter even handles two strings as input. The
docstring should reflect that and say that it is preferred to use `CC` /
`CDF` directly.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13110#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
