#14567: Refactor continued fractions
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
       Reporter:  vdelecroix                                    |         
Owner:  vdelecroix  
           Type:  enhancement                                   |        
Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major                                         |     
Milestone:  sage-5.10   
      Component:  number theory                                 |    
Resolution:              
       Keywords:  continued fractions, numerical approximation  |   Work 
issues:              
Report Upstream:  N/A                                           |     
Reviewers:              
        Authors:  vdelecroix                                    |     Merged 
in:              
   Dependencies:  #13213, #13957, #14563, #14568                |      
Stopgaps:              
----------------------------------------------------------------+-----------
Description changed by vdelecroix:

Old description:

> Continued fractions (in sage.rings.contfrac) do not do what we expect:
>
>  0. categories are not properly initialized nor used.
>  1. it only deals with rational numbers
>  2. there is no dedicated method for numerical approximations (which is
> one of the first aim of continued fractions)
>  4. there is no bridge with quadratic numbers (see also #11345)
>  3. there is no bridge with words (sage.combinat.words)
>
> The patch proposed here develop some general design for dealing with
> continued fractions and solves the issues 0, 1 and 4 (and I hope 2); see
> the discussion below.
>
> {{{
> sage: K.<sqrt2> = QuadraticField(2)
> sage: cff = (sqrt2/3 + 1/4).continued_fraction(); cff
> [0; 1, (2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 5, 1, 1, 14, 1, 1, 5)*]
> sage: cff.value()
> 1/3*sqrt2 + 1/4
> }}}
> In particular we solve the question in #11345.

New description:

 Continued fractions (in sage.rings.contfrac) do not do what we expect:

  1. categories are not properly initialized nor used.
  2. it only deals with rational numbers
  3. there is no dedicated method for numerical approximations (which is
 one of the first aim of continued fractions)
  4. there is no bridge with quadratic numbers (see also #11345)
  5. there is no bridge with words (sage.combinat.words)

 The patch proposed here develop some general design for dealing with
 continued fractions and solves the issues 1, 2 and 5 (and I hope 3); see
 the discussion below.

 {{{
 sage: K.<sqrt2> = QuadraticField(2)
 sage: cff = (sqrt2/3 + 1/4).continued_fraction(); cff
 [0; 1, (2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 5, 1, 1, 14, 1, 1, 5)*]
 sage: cff.value()
 1/3*sqrt2 + 1/4
 }}}
 In particular we solve the question in #11345.

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14567#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to