#14131: Greene-Kleitman partition of a poset
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Reporter: darij | Owner: sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: RSK, permutations, days45 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Travis Scrimshaw
Authors: Darij Grinberg | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------------+------------------------------
Comment (by darij):
TBH I'm not sure if this is a good reason; I was just saying this is the
reason why I chose {{{range}}}. Looking at the changes in Python 3.0 (
http://docs.python.org/3.1/whatsnew/3.0.html ), I suspect that most of our
code is going to break if we ever switch to 3.0 (I am using {{{None < 0}}}
several times in my Bender-Knuth code, for example), so I am not sure
whether to expect such a switch in the nearest time...
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14131#comment:19>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
