#7160: comparison with quadratic number field elements needs work
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: mhansen | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.10
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: sd35 | Work issues: doctest failures
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Mike Hansen, Burcin Erocal | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
> Now #13213 is in positive review (and performances much better than what
I expected at the begining)! Should we add a doctest related to the
example in the description of the ticket or do we simply close it as a
duplicate ?
If there are nearly identical examples to these in #13213, then I think
that's okay; if there is nothing like this there, we should add a trivial
patch. to check it's improved. I'm not going to look through that whole
patch to find ones like this but presumably you know whether there is one
like that, as the author :)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7160#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
