#12090: Arrangements of pseudolines
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
       Reporter:  ncohen         |         Owner:  mhampton    
           Type:  enhancement    |        Status:  needs_review
       Priority:  major          |     Milestone:  sage-5.10   
      Component:  geometry       |    Resolution:              
       Keywords:                 |   Work issues:  needs rebase
Report Upstream:  N/A            |     Reviewers:              
        Authors:  Nathann Cohen  |     Merged in:              
   Dependencies:  #12159 #11634  |      Stopgaps:              
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment (by hthomas):

 I (trivially) rebased the patch so it applies.

 I also uploaded a review patch (separate for ease of review).  I changed
 !PseudolinesArrangement to !PseudolineArrangement.  I think this is more
 idiomatic. I made other minor changes to the English throughout.

 I slightly moved the labels in the wiring diagram output, so they don't
 overlap the diagram.

 I made a small change which simplifies slightly the logic of the reading
 of the Felsner encoding.  Maybe there was a reason for the way it was, but
 I couldn't see it.  Please check me!

 I'm not too happy about this:
 {{{
 sage: from sage.geometry.pseudolines import PseudolineArrangement
 sage: t=PseudolineArrangement([(1,2),(0,2),(1,0)],encoding="permutations")
 sage: s=PseudolineArrangement(([1,2],[0,2],[1,0]),encoding="permutations")
 sage: r=PseudolineArrangement([[1,2],[0,2],[1,0]],encoding="permutations")
 sage: s==r
 False
 sage: t==r
 False
 }}}

 Do you think the fact that the documentation refers to lists is enough to
 warn the user not to use tuples?  It was a pleasure (and instructive!) to
 read your very efficient code, so I didn't want to mess it up with a
 clumsy attempt to handle this myself.

 apply trac_12090-rebase.patch, trac_12090-review.patch

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12090#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to